Reclaim Democracy!

  • Home
  • Issues
    • The Right to Vote
      • U.S. Voting History
      • 50+ Ways to Disenfranchise or Suppress Voters
    • Corporate Personhood
    • Citizens United
    • Direct Democracy
    • All Topics
  • Resources
    • Ed Board Meetings
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Op-eds
    • Presentations & Workshops
    • Talk Radio
    • Tools for Activism
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Homegrown Businesses, Not Global Chains, Build Community Prosperity

July 18, 2012 by staff

I’ll say this for the featured speakers on the opening day of the recent Montana Economic Development Summit: they were consistent. Speaker after speaker noted Montana must “compete in the global economy” to thrive and how the internet was key to doing so. The clichés quickly grew old, but ideas only become clichés if they present some truth.

Technology and international trade undoubtedly serve an important role in Montana’s economy. Yet the cheerleading for corporate globalization only elevated my skepticism of the keynote speakers’ motives (all out-of-state, white, male millionaires or billionaires). After all, if something really improves people’s lives, you don’t need to tell them repeatedly how great it is.

More concerning was the invisibility of community-serving businesses—hardware stores, grocers, farmers and countless other businesses that serve the everyday needs of Montanans. These businesses may lack the sex-appeal of global exporters, but they are the bedrock of local economic vitality. Moreover, their importance only will grow as transportation costs rise and diminish the advantage wielded by global corporations dependent on cheap fuel and weak regulations abroad.

Unfortunately, Target and Wal-Mart—the only two retailers with tables in the Summit’s exhibition hall—represent the opposite of sustainable economic development. Global chains’ displacement of local businesses ensures more dollars will leave the local economy and fosters dependence on corporations with no real commitment to our communities. The history of Butte, MT, where the summit was held, provides a prime example of how such dependence ultimately can ravage a local economy and environment.

But while these mega-corporations and their entourage of think tanks and public relations firms persuade us of their benefits, the benefits of doing business locally often go unappreciated or ignored.

We have much to gain personally from the knowledge, personal service, and quality offered by independent businesses, but the economic benefits are less obvious. Independent local businesses typically hire local designers, sign makers and attorneys to get started. Whether employing people in-house or hiring other local firms, they create opportunities for insurance brokers, computer consultants, advertising agencies and others.

In contrast, global chains typically open a clone of their other units. Locally, they employ many clerks and cashiers, but provide few higher paid jobs and use minimal local goods and services. Meanwhile, profits exit town to corporate headquarters. Thus, local independent merchants recirculate three or more times as much of each dollar in the local economy as chain stores—a multiplier effect that drives economic growth far more than attracting outside entities.

Independent businesses often look for ways to stand out in their communities, embracing unique and memorable tools that reflect their commitment to quality and personal service. One such tool is the use of metal business cards, which offer a level of sophistication and durability that traditional paper cards lack.

Unlike generic cards, Metal Kards add a distinctive touch that resonates with clients and colleagues alike, symbolizing the business’s dedication to excellence and individuality. These cards often become conversation pieces, helping local businesses establish a lasting presence in the minds of potential customers while enhancing their brand’s image.

In today’s digital age, standing out in a crowded market isn’t just about physical presence—online visibility is just as crucial. SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is essential for independent businesses aiming to increase visibility and reach a broader audience. Effective SEO strategies not only help improve a website’s ranking on search engines but also ensure that a business’s online presence reflects its unique qualities and values.

Just like a well-crafted metal card, a strong SEO strategy leaves a lasting impression, helping local businesses build credibility and trust with potential customers who are actively searching for services. One powerful aspect of SEO that can significantly enhance a business’s online presence is link building.

By obtaining quality backlinks from reputable sources, businesses can improve their domain authority and overall search engine ranking. SERPninja is an excellent resource for businesses looking to grow their backlink profile. With its proven strategies for acquiring high-quality, relevant links, this company helps businesses build a strong online foundation.

By focusing on these organic methods of growth, local businesses can create a digital presence that mirrors the trust and connection they foster with their community, establishing themselves as a prominent force in both the local and online markets.

Small manufacturers and service industries also have a stake in the health of these entrepreneurs, who are more willing give their new products and services a chance. Independent businesses, in many realms, are interdependent; their fortunes rise and fall together.

Further, local businesses also return a greater percentage of sales to civic events and community causes, though you don’t often see them photographed with table-sized checks to call attention themselves.

Despite “globalization” hype, understanding the multiplier effect and the benefits of a local ownership is crucial to intelligent, sustainable development in our communities.

Retail chains boast how their stores create hundreds of jobs, but “create” is simply a euphemism for “relocate.” We don’t suddenly need more toasters or toilet paper when a big box store opens. As a result, nearly 85% of sales at new big box discount stores come directly from existing local businesses. Combine this impact with the efficiency of consolidating most well-paying jobs at headquarters, and most chains become net disemployers.

Chain proliferation hasn’t just resulted from market competition; it’s had plenty of help from what Stacy Mitchell, author of the outstanding book Big Box Swindle , calls “the invisible hand of Uncle Sam.” For local officials luring a new national chain is politically seductive and much easier than actual job creation. As a result many chains receive millions of dollars in local and state subsidies—creating a decidedly uneven playing field for independent competitors (whether or not such subsidies are offered locally).

The real giants like Wal-Mart are masters of extracting public subsidies, but they’re not alone. For example, Cabela’s is seeking to move into Montana, starting with Billings, but prefers not to compete in a “free market.” The corporation is seeking municipal subsidies that few (if any) Montana outfitters enjoy.

Tax evasion schemes also unfairly handicap entrepreneurs who pay their fair share of taxes—and raise them for the rest of us. Incredibly, when State Senator Jim Elliot investigated corporate income taxes in Montana, he discovered 40 percent of the largest 500 corporations doing businesses in Montana paid less than $500 in state income taxes in 2002. Such perverse practices must change to create a level (or better) playing field for homegrown businesses; chains already have enough laws rigged in their favor nationally.

For long-term progress, a conceptual change also is necessary. As citizens, we should consciously plan our future with rules that will encourage the values we want reflected in our communities. And as consumers, each time we spend money, we should weigh the full value of our choices, not just for ourselves short-term, but for the future we want in our own hometowns.

By Jeff Milchen, co-founder of the American Independent Business Alliance, which helps communities around the country form coalitions that help independent business compete effectively and prevent chains from displacing local entrepreneurs.

Filed Under: Independent Business

Volunteer

July 17, 2012 by staff

Reclaim Democracy depends on the efforts of volunteers in almost every realm of our work. You can help! Here are a few of the ongoing opportunities. If you are interested in helping, please visit our “contact us” page or email us at info@reclaimdemocracy.org.

Writing & Editing

  • Research – We always need research assistance and most can be done on the web, but access to library research material is sometimes needed.
  • Write Articles – Knowledge or research of current issues related to our goals and strong persuasive writing skills are required. Most articles for our web site or newsletter also appear in major print media. For skilled writers, we will help develop and market your writing. Please send us at least one published clip. 6-50 hours per article.
  • Spanish Translation – For individuals proficient in English to Spanish translation, we aim to translate much more of our material. Translations can be done at the convenience of volunteers via e-mail.

Grassroots Outreach / Fundraising

  • Tabling – Represent us at above-mentioned fairs, festivals, and other venues. Good speaking skills and knowledge of our work is required (a few hours of reading). ~ 3 – 12 hours / event.
  • Host an informational / fundraising party – The best source of new activists and donors is through our existing supporters. Let your friends, neighbors and others know about our work.We’ll provide plenty of support to help.
  • Schedule a Local Presentation – Bring a ReclaimDemocracy.org speaker to your community. This can be a great way to jump-start local organizing. Contact us to learn more.
  • Organize / Participate in a Chapter / Local Working Group – May include some of the following: place posters around towns, write letters to local papers, set up slide shows locally, or work towards city/county resolutions. See our “What You Can Do” primer for more ideas.

Research

  • Varies constantly–please inquire.

In-office Opportunities (for those near Bozeman, MT)

  • General Office Help – Answer calls, help with research,  perform essential administrative tasks. Minimum commitment: 4 hours / week, 3 months. Regularly scheduled weekly.  Opportunities for paid employment after 3-4 months of reliable work.

We also seek help from volunteers with specialized skills, including: accounting, fundraising, web design, graphic design, cartoonists, computer troubleshooters and more. Contact us to learn more.

Filed Under: Activism

Who Says the Debates Need to Change? Voices from All Over the Political Spectrum Decry Duopoly Control

July 17, 2012 by staff

Thanks to OpenDebates.org for providing many of these quotations

From the Media

“The debates are part of the unconscionable fraud that our political campaigns have become.a format that defies meaningful discourse. They should be charged with sabotaging the electoral process.”
-Walter Cronkite

“By deciding yesterday to exclude Ross Perot from this year’s debates, the commission proved itself to be a tool of the two dominant parties rather than guardian of the public interest. This commission has no legal standing to monopolize debates, and it is time for some more fair-minded group to get into the business of sponsoring these important events.”
– New York Times editorial, 1996

“In dictatorships, it’s common for political insiders to hinder or even silence non-establishment challengers. To do that in America , which supposedly champions open elections, is outrageous and intolerable. But that is just what the Commission on Presidential Debates has done.
– Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel editorial

“The Commission on Presidential Debates is a corrupt stranglehold on our democracy.”
– Phil Donahue

From Republicans

“I’m for more open debates.I think the very concept of an elite commission deciding for the American people who deserves to be heard is profoundly wrong.”
– Newt Gingrich

“I want to see my party achieve victory based on what we have to offer this country and our ability to offer it with integrity. I don’t want to see us achieve victory based on the fact that we are better at rigging the game than other people.”
– Alan Keyes

But if broadening participation in the debates increases public participation in our political process, that can only be good for America .”
– Oliver North

” We really ought to stop trying to manipulate history before it’s happened.”
– Clarence Page of The Chicago Tribune

“The debate commission is a corrupt duopoly.”
– Steve Forbes

“I’m trying to forget the whole damn experience of those debates. ‘Cause I think it’s too much show business and too much prompting, too much artificiality, and not really debates. They’re rehearsed appearances.”
– Former President George H. W. Bush

Democrats

“Where did these people come from to be final arbiters of free speech?”
– John Culver, a former US senator and CPD director.

“It’s fundamentally undemocratic. It’s awfully close to corruption.If this group can arbitrarily rule that a billionaire who gets 20 million votes and qualifies for $30 million in election funds can’t participate then God help the rest of us.”
– Jesse Jackson, after Ross Perot was excluded from the presidential debates in 1996

“The American people are the losers because the real issues never are aired by the candidates.”
– U.S. Representative Ed Markey, (D-MA).

Others

“The Commission on Presidential Debates must be replaced if we want to have a democracy in this country.”
– John B. Anderson, former Republican Congressman and independent presidential candidate

“Competition is healthy in all things. Third-party candidates in presidential debates will have the effect, ultimately, not of weakening the two-party system, but of strengthening it.”
– Michael R. Beschloss

Filed Under: Transforming Politics

Tips for Effective Calls to Talk Radio

July 17, 2012 by staff

Talk radio is a great venue for groups to shift public opinion and where everyone can learn effective communication. To deliver your message clearly and powerfully:

  • Familiarize yourself with the program before calling, especially if the host holds opposing views to the one you’re delivering. If you think the host may be antagonistic, learn points of agreement you can use as a “launching pad”
  • Cater to the audience: speak their language and know their perspective
  • Focus on one main message and make the messages consistent across the members of your group
  • Stories/emotion + facts/reason = persuasion; integrate an element of each, especially if your audience is not already on your side. In that situation especially, a compelling story is powerful
  • Know your sources; be prepared cite to a source that’s respected by that show’s audience
  • Be concise and direct; make your case quickly (most callers get less than one minute), but speak in real sentences and not just sound bites. Skip any greetings or pleasantries (e.g., “how are you doing?”) and go straight to the topic
  • Practice your 30-50 second pitch out loud, and repeat until you can do it smoothly and comfortably; keep a few bullet points (not a script) in front of you if that helps (no one will see you looking!)
  • Be prepared for the screener. If the show is open to all views or the host is sympathetic, just make your quick pitch. If you don’t normally hear views that dissent from the hosts’, be aware that you may need to bluff to get on the air. In this case, starting with a point of agreement with host can be critical
  • Make sure you have time to wait and turn off your radio when cued by the screener
  • Listen to the show from the start, when you plan to call and get in the queue early. If possible, plan with an ally to tag-team with calls during the same hour to reinforce the first call.
  • Direct people to your preferred source for more information and action; articulate it clearly and repeat it if possible
  • Close with a clear call to action, if applicable

Also…

  • Try humor and modesty when communicating with others
  • Use a calm, confident voice; a positive tone attracts people to your ideas
  • Avoid long pauses; hosts hate dead air
  • Remember your real target: the listeners; don’t try to “win” an argument with the host. Focus on the message you want listeners to take away or the action you want them to take
  • Befriend the host; even host with starkly differing views may come to appreciate a respectful and well-prepared antagonist; pay them a genuine compliment when possible and let them know you listen
  • Take notes a soon as you hang up to improve your performance next time. You often can stream recent episodes on a show’s website.

Have fun!

Contact us for information on media trainings.

Other Tools for Activism

Writing Effective Letters to the Editor

Write Effective Op-eds & Get Them Published

Filed Under: Activism, Education & Critical Thinking Curriculum

The Citizens’ Presidential Debate Commission

July 16, 2012 by staff

The nationally televised presidential debates are the single most influential forum for most Americans in deciding whether they should vote and for whom to vote. They offer a rare opportunity to hear candidates’ ideas unedited and in context.

Since 1988, these debates have been controlled by the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), a private corporation created and controlled by individuals directly affiliated with the Democratic and Republican parties. The CPD operates with no public oversight, and its ability to serve democracy is compromised by its bipartisan control.

The two major harms perpetuated by the CPD are the exclusion of serious and popular candidates from outside of the two dominant parties and the exclusion of many vital issues from questions asked of the candidates.

Citizens’ Debate Commission Objectives:

Previous attempts to open the CPD events to deserving candidates and excluded issues repeatedly have failed. Therefore, we reject attempts to persuade the CPD to serve democracy and instead have helped initiate the Citizens’ Debate Commission (CDC) in order to create substantive, fair and non-partisan debates.

The CDC is a truly non-partisan coalition, representing a broad spectrum of views and issues, that will present a series of four debates among candidates in the 2004 general election for President of the United States. The Commission also will host one debate among candidates running for Vice-President.

Presidential Debate Criteria

The Citizens’ Debate Commission employs the criteria proposed by the Appleseed Citizens’ Task Force on Fair Debates

The first debate shall be open to all contenders who:

  1. Meet constitutional requirements to hold the office;
  2. Have qualified on enough state ballots to potentially win 270 electoral votes outright;
  3. Possess a substantial level of popular support. To gauge support, the CDC will independently commission polls of the general public or work with established polling organizations that are willing to construct unbiased polls (and ones not limited to habitual voters) 7-14 days prior to the first debate. Candidates must meet one of the following two measures of support:
    1. The declared support of 5% or more of respondents; or
    2. 50% or more of respondents say they want to hear the candidate debate.

Candidates meeting either one of these criteria in the first poll will be invited to participate in the first and second debates, after which a new poll will be executed. Those who meet the same criteria in the second poll will be invited to participate in the third and fourth debates.

Vice-Presidential Debate

The vice-presidential candidates on tickets meeting the criteria to participate in the third and fourth presidential debates will be invited to one debate among the candidates for vice-president. This debate will occur after the second debate, but before the third.

CDC Aims and Strategy

CDC will offer the opportunity for debates presenting a wider range of views than has occurred in any prior televised debates in general presidential elections. An expanded range of discussion will be facilitated regardless of whether or not more than two candidates qualify for any debates. Empowering and encouraging moderators to ask challenging follow-up questions, and allowing opportunities for genuine citizen participation are examples of how this will be accomplished.

The CDC will:

  • present the most widely viewed, covered and respected presidential debates;
  • have all CDC debates televised by the major broadcast networks and independent media;
  • attract all candidates for the presidency who meet participation criteria;
  • further democracy through debates that will include a wider range of participants and ideas and structured to challenge and engage candidates and the audience to a degree not reached by CPD events.

CDC Structure and Governance

The CDC is a new non-profit organization separate from ReclaimDemocracy.org and includes organizational representatives from across the ideological spectrum. Decisions will be made by a board of directors representing a variety of non-partisan organizations with broad constituencies.

The CDC is not a forum for furthering specific political parties or agendas, but to promote and present a debate series with democracy at its core and facilitate the discussion of a broad range of issues that have been ignored in CPD debates.

Because the public deserves televised presidential debates that operate unmistakably in the public interest, the CDC only will accept organizational funding from entities that are non-partisan and non-profit.

The Inaugural CDC Board of Directors is:

  • John B. Anderson, former U.S. Congressman and Chair of the Center for Voting and Democracy;
  • Angela ‘Bay’ Buchanan, president of The American Cause;
  • Veronica de la Garza, executive director of the Youth Vote Coalition;
  • Norman Dean, director of Friends of the Earth;
  • George Farah, director of Open Debates and author of “No Debate”;
  • Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch;
  • Tom Gerety, director, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law;
  • Jehmu Greene, director of Rock the Vote;
  • Alan Keyes, U.S. Ambassador;
  • Jeff Milchen, director of ReclaimDemocracy.org;
  • Larry Noble, former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission;
  • Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council;
  • Chellie Pingree, president and CEO of Common Cause;
  • Randall Robinson, founder of TransAfrica Forum;
  • Dan Stein, director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform;
  • Mark Weisbrot, co-director of Center for Economic and Policy Research;
  • Paul Weyrich, chair and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation (since deceased)

Editor’s note: Our work to build the CDC is unrelated to any presidential candidate or party.

 

Filed Under: Transforming Politics

Writing Effective Letters to the Editor

July 16, 2012 by staff

By Jeff Milchen

Letters in newspapers and magazines are prime forums for getting your message to a wide audience. These tips will help increase the likelihood of your letters to the editor (LTEs) published and maximize their impact.

Do:

  • For most publications, respond directly to a recently published article or commentary. Follow the target publication’s norm, but a typical response format is: Re “Talking With the Taxman,” (news, Jan. 13). Your report neglected one key fact… Small local papers may allow writers to raise an issue without responding directly to something published.
  • Focus on one important point and don’t try to address multiple issues in one letter. Be sure to follow the publication’s guidelines and word count limit (up to 250 words is common for local papers, but some larger publications demand shorter letters).
  • Maximize your chance of being published by removing every non-essential word. For example, don’t say, “I think…” It’s obvious. This also minimizes the chance of editors changing the letter.
  • Use verified facts. Take the time to check original sources rather than repeating a “fact” cited in another media outlet.
  • Create immediacy by indicating how readers will be impacted by the issue you’re addressing.
  • Balance criticism with a positive call to action. This includes your elected representatives — by including their names in the letter and asking for action, you can get their attention. Point people to a source for information or to engage when practical.
  • Speak in the language and literacy level of the publication’s readers. Envision a person you seek to influence when writing. This will help focus your message better than writing for “everyone.”
  • When writing to your local newspaper in smaller towns or cities, follow up with a polite phone inquiry about its status if it doesn’t appear within a few days.
  • E-mail your letter in the body of the email (never send unsolicited attachments) and put “Letter re: your topic or article name” in the subject line. If you wish to copy others or submit to more than one publication, do so in a separate email. Include your address and phone for verification.
  • Pay attention to letters and comments by others. Note effective and ineffective approaches (especially letters that argue a position you oppose), style, length, etc.
  • Don’t limit yourself to critiquing articles. A story that reports favorably on your group or issue presents a great opportunity to repeat a key point while adding one of your own. This also helps build the perception of being a positively-focused group.
  • If your target publication includes links in letters published online, seize the opportunity to expose readers to preferred sources or your organization.
  • Use quotation marks to indicate the title of an article. Most newspapers don’t use italics or bold in the body (and never all caps).
  • Have someone proofread your letter before submitting it— ideally before reading the original article. Why? Many readers won’t recall the original or never read it, so your letter should stand on its own.
  • Magazines: Acceptable lengths for letters in magazines vary widely, so look for guidelines and observe the magazine’s range and style. Many magazines tend to be read by like-minded people, rather than the broader cross-sections of newspaper readers. Consider the typical reader and keep her in mind.
  • Use active, concise language. Strong writing uses descriptive nouns and active, informative verbs. Activating language eliminates almost every instance of “to be” (has, have, is, was, be, been, were) Each time you find one of these words in your draft, reword your sentence with active verbs. Similarly, the word “that” is rarely necessary. The Elements of Style is an excellent guide to clear, concise writing.
  • Include a title of 3-8 words. Editors will rarely use your exact wording, but your suggestion makes it more likely they’ll choose a framing you like.

Avoid:

  • Don’t overstate/exaggerate your points. One overstatement makes every following point suspect.
  • Don’t name-call or insult your opponents.
  • Avoid jargon or acronyms (spell out any name the first time you use it, followed by the acronym in parentheses).

Don’t consider your effort a failure if your letter to the editor isn’t used in large publications, even the best letters face long odds. Each LTE is read and plays a role in molding the thinking and selection of the editors.

Other Resources

  • Strunk & White’s The Elements of Style, a great writers guide
  • Tips for Effective Calls to Talk Radio
  • Write Effective Op-eds & Get Them Published

The creator of this primer, Jeff Milchen, previously directed Reclaim Democracy!

Filed Under: Activism, Education & Critical Thinking Curriculum

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 43
  • Next Page »

Search our website

Our Mission

Reclaim Democracy! works toward a more democratic republic, where citizens play an active role in shaping our communities, states, and nation. We believe a person’s influence should be based on the quality of their ideas, skills, and energy, and not based on wealth, race, gender, or orientation.

We believe every citizen should enjoy an affirmative right to vote and have their vote count equally.

Learn more about our work.

Donate to Our Work

We rely on individual gifts for more than 95% of our funding. Our hard-working volunteers make your gift go a long way. We're grateful for your help, and your donation is tax-deductible.

Join Us on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Weekly Quote

"The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth."

-- Wendell Berry

Copyright © 2025 · Reclaim Democracy!