Reclaim Democracy!

  • Home
  • Issues
    • The Right to Vote
      • U.S. Voting History
      • 50+ Ways to Disenfranchise or Suppress Voters
    • Corporate Personhood
    • Citizens United
    • Direct Democracy
    • All Topics
  • Resources
    • Ed Board Meetings
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Op-eds
    • Presentations & Workshops
    • Talk Radio
    • Tools for Activism
  • Donate
  • About
  • Contact

Archives for July 2012

Amazon.com Usurps Process of Direct Democracy to Perpetuate Corporate Subsidy

July 31, 2012 by staff

By Orson Aguilar and Michelle Romero
First Published by the San Francisco Chronicle, July 28, 2011

Editor’s Note: Amazon Corporation is the latest corporation to usurp direct democracy to serve its ends. In its quest to continue its tax evasion scheme, Amazon will be fighting against Walmart Corporation, perhaps the most frequent abuser of the process. For those interested in learning more about corporations and the ballot process, this battle will provoke us to update this recently-dormant page, which offers many background resources. For more on why exempting internet corporations from the tax-collection responsibilities storefront businesses must follow, we suggest this Business Week article from our allies at the American Independent Business Alliance.

Amazon.com, the giant Internet retailer, has decided to put an initiative on California’s ballot to try to evade having to pay the same sales taxes that other retailers pay. As the system stands, Amazon’s chance of getting its self-interested proposal on the ballot is essentially 100 percent.

Something is very wrong with this picture.

Amazon, the Internet giant that began as a bookseller and branched out into other retail, has local merchants up against a wall in part because until now it has been able to avoid collecting sales tax on purchases. That gives it an 8 percent or more price advantage over local stores. So the Legislature, faced with an ongoing budget catastrophe that has forced cuts to schools, universities, parks, care for the elderly and other vital government functions, sensibly acted to close this loophole. Now Amazon plans to buy its way onto the ballot to repeal this reasonable action.

This is just the latest example of how our ballot initiative system – designed by reformers a century ago to reduce corporate influence on state government by giving ordinary citizens the ability to make laws – has been turned upside down.

In the past year or so, we have seen oil companies try to strangle our clean energy law, insurance companies seek to evade state rate regulations, a major utility company try to block local governments from establishing public power systems, and a variety of corporate interests push to make it harder to raise taxes or fees on big companies. That said, Californians rightly value their ability to go to the ballot with their own ideas for new laws. The process can have great benefits, but it’s time to figure out how to put citizens, not special interests, back in charge of “citizen democracy.”

Right now, the system is hopelessly skewed toward moneyed interests. Because of the vast number of signatures required and the short time in which they must be gathered, most initiatives qualify largely or entirely through the use of paid signature gatherers. If you have a couple of million bucks to pay petitioners, you can get a proposal onto California’s ballot. It’s as simple as that.

This isn’t what Gov. Hiram Johnson and his fellow reformers intended when they created the initiative system. That’s why the Greenlining Institute and other organizations have begun to return the system to the ideal of citizen democracy.

Our polling and research suggest several potential reforms. Voters consistently want more reliable information on who supports and opposes initiatives. There is also interest in a formal process for reviewing and revising proposed initiatives, through either an independent citizens’ commission or perhaps the state Supreme Court. And we need to find ways to make the system accessible to true grassroots initiatives, perhaps by lowering the signature count required.

We don’t have all the answers yet, but we’re convinced the system can be fixed.

Orson Aguilar is executive director and Michelle Romero is redistricting fellow of the Greenlining Institute.

© 2011 SF Chronicle

Filed Under: Corporate Accountability, Corporate Welfare / Corporate Tax Issues

Campaigns

July 31, 2012 by staff

Revoking Corporate “Free Speech”

One of the core beliefs of Reclaim Democracy is that our Constitution’s Bill of Rights exists to protect the rights of living human beings and their voluntary associations exclusively. Yet since the late 1800s, federal judges have ignored the fact that corporations go unmentioned in our Constitution, and created a broad array of “corporate constitutional rights. Their arguments claim that corporations are legal “persons,” entitled to the protections of our Bill of Rights.

A decade before Citizens United v FEC launched the issue to the forefront, we established the web’s most comprehensive resource on corporate personhood to both explain, and lead to reversing, the process by which corporations seized the legal rights of human beings. This long-term struggle is a foundation of our work, and through Move To Amend, a national coalition of groups working toward this end.

In 2003, we used the Supreme Court case of Nike v. Kasky to challenge corporate “free speech” privileges and engage a national audience in rethinking such ill-gotten privileges. Now we’re building a campaign to erode and, ultimately, revoke the Supreme Court-created “right” of corporations to influence (and even run their own) ballot initiatives that dates to 1978’s First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti ruling.

We are using high-profile battles to broaden awareness of this outrageous usurpation of citizens’ power and build toward the long term goal of reversing Bellotti. Our campaign plans and many background materials are posted here. Our proposed constitutional amendments address this and other long-term goals.

Establish a Citizens’ Debate Commission

The nationally televised presidential debates are the single most influential forum for most Americans to inform their views on presidential candidates, and offer a rare opportunity to hear candidates’ ideas unedited and in context. To our national disgrace, these debates have been controlled since 1988 by a front group of the Democratic and Republican parties that lacks any public accountability — the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD).

During the 2000 election cycle, we had considerable success in raising public awareness of the illegitimacy of the CPD. That campaign led us to the necessary work of displacing the CPD with real debates that will serve democracy. In 2004, ReclaimDemocracy.org catalyzed and co-founded the Citizens’ Debate Commission (CDC), now supported by dozens of civic organizations from all over the political spectrum. Our ultimate goal of replacing the CPD with genuinely democratic debates will take some years to accomplish, but even in the first year the CDC helped force important changes that have moved the events from the sound-bite battles of recent years to more substantive debate.

See Presidential Debates Should Serve Citizens and Democracy, Not Political Parties for an overview and links to our research, writing and outside resources on the issue.

Critical Thinking Curriculum Project

ReclaimDemocracy.org has raised awareness of commercialism and corporate propaganda encroaching into every pocket of daily life. In addition to our articles, primers, and presentations, we seek to bring such awareness in classrooms — to tomorrow’s citizens. Our Critical Thinking Curriculum (no new materials currently being produced until we find a new volunteer or obtain funding for staff time) helps teachers nurture critical thinking skills in students of all ages, beginning with media literacy.

By helping our kids to learn how to determine the source of the messages they receive through a variety of media, they become savvy media users. They learn to challenge ideas presented to them through news stories, advertisements, textbooks and more.

See Branded: Corporations in Our Schools for one example of why this project is needed.

Breaking New Perspectives into the Mass Media

Our ongoing efforts to bring our message to the masses have resulted in op-eds by ReclaimDemocracy.org staff appearing in the nation’s most prominent newspapers — papers like the Washington Post, Newsday, The Chicago Tribune, La Opinion (the nation’s largest Spanish language paper) and dozens more. We continue our success in reaching our target audience through insightful writing that gets to the democratic root of the issues making headlines. Our outreach also consistently involves talk radio and occasionally televised talk shows.

Examples include: forewarning the public of the corporate agenda for commercializing public lands; re-framing the debate on campaign finance and other electoral reforms; and calling for true accountability for corporate crime and criminals.We invite you to contact us regarding adapting these articles and others for use in your local or regional media outlets

Volunteer opportunities: We always seek to work with skilled writers and researchers interested in reaching a broad audience.

Past/Ongoing Accomplishments

As Citizens United v FEC made its way to the Supreme Court, Reclaim Democracy principals teamed up with representatives of many other pro-democracy organizations to lay plans for exploiting the opportunity, win our lose, to launch corporate personhood into public awareness.

The result was Move To Amend, a nationwide coalition of grassroots organizations working toward the common goal of amending the Constitution to make clear the Constitutional rights are for living beings and that spending money to influence elections is subject to limitations needed to allow all citizens’ voices to be heard.

Before Reclaim Democracy.org was staffed, our director launched a first-of-kind model in Colorado, the Boulder Independent Business Alliance. BIBA helped locally owned, independently operated businesses to succeed, ensure continued opportunities for entrepreneurs, and strove to reverse the trend of losing such businesses to national chains.

We subsequently helped spread the successful model until, much like the Citizens’ Debate Commission, we teamed with others to help spawn the American Independent Business Alliance (AMIBA) to fill a role that merited a singularly-focused organization. AMIBA has since helped seed more than eighty more local alliances and maintains a vital communication network among these community-level efforts, while working to enhance national consciousness of the importance of community-based businesses.

Notably, AMIBA also is the leading grassroots business organization making clear that enshrining corporations with human rights is anti-business and anti-market. See AMIBA.net

 

Filed Under: Activism, Corporate Personhood, Education & Critical Thinking Curriculum, Independent Business, Media, Transforming Politics

Reports and Economic Impact Studies on Wal-Mart and Big Box Development

July 22, 2012 by staff

Since other organizations now dedicate extensive time to reviewing and collecting studies on big box development and related topics, we are no longer adding to this archive. Three excellent libraries are noted and linked at: Independent Business, Chain and “Big Box” Retail Studies.

Nov 2011 –  Food for Thought (report on projected impact on Harlem’s grocers by Borough President’s office)

April 2011 – Does Local Firm Ownership Matter? (Economic Development Quarterly). Communities with many small, locally owned businesses saw greater income growth, while absentee-owned businesses had negative impact.

Apr 2011 –  Big Box Retail and Living Wage Policies (U. Cal. Berkeley Ctr. for Labor Research and Education)

Jan 2011 –  Wal-Mart’s Economic Footprint. A literature review asembled by the Center for Community Planning and Development at Hunter College (NY)

Jan 2011 –  Superstores: How to Analyze Their Impact on Your Town is a toolkit sold by Rodino Associates

Feb 2010 –  Dominant Retailers Incentives for Product Quality (pdf) (multi-university study)

Dec 2009 –  The Impact of an Urban Wal-Mart Store on Area Businesses – by Center for Urban Research and Learning at Loyola University Chicago

June 2008 –  Save Money, Live Better: a report on Walmart’s state tax avoidance schemes. Published by Walmart Watch.

June 2008 – Has Wal-Mart Buried Mom and Pop? Study by Andrea Dean and Russell Sobel of W. Virginia U.

Dec 2007 – A Downward Push: The Impact of Wal-Mart Stores on Retail Wages and Benefits A study from U. Cal. Berkeley Labor Center (10 pp pdf)

Dec 2006 – Wal-Mart and Social Capital. Produced by the American Agricultural Economics Association (8 pp pdf).

June 2006 – Study by Economic Policy Institute Says Wal-Mart’s Claimed Savings for Customers are Greatly Exaggerated (link is to text summary).

May 2006 – Wal-Mart and Crime. A report on local impacts of stores by the anti-Wal-Mart group WakeUp Wal-Mart (29 pp pdf).

Sept 2005 – What Do We Know About Wal-Mart? Compiles latest data on the corporation’s pay, benefits and compliance with laws, and compares to other retailers. New York data highlighted. (Brennan Center for Justice, 12 pp pdf).

Sept 2005 – Wal-Mart and the Waltons: Self-Interested Philanthropy (Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, pdf).

June 2005 – NBC’s Dateline investigated conditions in overseas factories that supply Wal-Mart and other retailers in this report (transcript and video clips available).

Nov 2004 – PBS’ Frontline produced the documentary “Is Wal-Mart Good for America?” and many informative articles to accompany it.

Oct 2004 – Wal-Mart and County-Wide Poverty (16 pp. pdf) is a study produced by Penn State U.

Aug 2004 – The Hidden Cost of Wal-Mart Jobs (16 pp. pdf). This study from the U. of California, Berkeley, Labor Center adds up costs to taxpayers that result from Wal-Mart employees needing various forms of welfare. Note that the Center is unabashedly pro-union. See also this Response to Criticisms by Wal-Mart and media coverage of the report.

Jan 2004 – Supercenters and the Transformation of the Bay Area Grocery Industry: Issues, Trends, and Impacts. This study (108 pp. pdf) by the Bay Area Economic Forum has the most thorough data we’ve seen on wages, prices, and numerous other issues. Though the analysis is regional, most data is national.

Jan 2004 – “Wal-Mart Supercenters, What’s in Store for Southern California?” (45 pp. pdf) Released only with the client’s (Wal-Mart) input and approval, this uniquely rosy report is suspect due to some glaring holes, such as ignoring employee benefits in its economic calculations.

July 2001 – A PBS special, “Store Wars,” explored the battle over Wal-Mart’s entry in a small town. Accompanying online resources include a teacher’s guide for helping students evaluate the issue.

Feb 1997 – The Shils Report. This huge study from Dr. Edward Shils at U. of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School has a wealth of information on big box retail impacts, predatory pricing, and much more.

Web pages from the Institute for Local Self Reliance link many other useful studies on Wal-Mart and big box retail.

See our WalMart resources page and Walmart topic page or these anti-Walmart t-shirts, stickers, and more.

Please help support this work — make a tax-deductible donation to Reclaim Democracy today!

Filed Under: Walmart

Give a Gift to Your Local Economy

July 18, 2012 by staff

Holiday shopping choices make a big impact on your community

By Stacy Mitchell

Whether to patronize a chain or a locally owned business is not top of mind for many holiday shoppers, but it should be. It’s a choice that has profound implications for our economy.

If you shop at an independent toy store, such as Be Beep in Annapolis, Maryland, you will likely see products made by Beka, a small toy manufacturer in St. Paul, Minnesota.

A family-owned business, Beka has opted not to sell to chains like Target and Wal-Mart. Doing so, explains co-owner Jamie Kreisman, would require moving production to low-wage factories overseas, which would eliminate what he and his brothers most love about the business: their relationships with their employees and working hands-on with their products.

Beka is healthy, but its future depends entirely on the survival of independent toy stores. Over the last decade, Wal-Mart and Target have aggressively overtaken this sector and now capture 45 percent of U.S. toy sales.

If you buy groceries for your holiday meals at an independent grocer, like Catalano’s Market in Fresno, California, you will find lots of food produced by small-scale, local farmers, such as Paul Buxman.

A second-generation grower of peaches, Buxman nearly lost his farm selling to supermarket chains, which demand cutthroat prices and truckloads of perfect-looking, though often flavorless, fruit that only industrial farms can supply.

With bankruptcy looming, Buxman dropped the chains and forged relationships with independents like Catalano’s. He works hard to give them the best fruit and they honor this by paying a fair price and accepting the natural ebb and flow of supply.

Today, Buxman’s farm is back on track. Catalano’s is doing well too, but owner Michael Catalano worries about Fresno approving still more chain supermarkets and recently a Wal-Mart. Since 1998, the top five supermarket chains, led by Wal-Mart, have doubled their market share and now capture nearly half of all grocery spending.

Patronize an independent CD store, like Waterloo Records in Austin, and you not only support a business owned by a music aficionado, but help to ensure opportunities for new artists. Many beloved bands got their start when a few store owners fell in love with their first albums and began recommending them.

That does not happen at Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and other mass merchandisers, which now account for more than half of all album sales, but stock only chart-toppers and have no room for unknowns.

Chain retailers have expanded dramatically over the last two decades. Home Depot and Lowe’s, barely a blip on the radar screen in 1986, control half of the hardware and building supply market. Barnes & Noble and Borders account for half of bookstore sales. Every sector is now dominated by a couple of chains, and Wal-Mart dominates them all, capturing one of every ten retail dollars we spend.

We assume that the chains represent economic progress, but in fact they take far more out of our economy than they contribute.

As the chains have expanded, tens of thousands of independent retailers have lost their livelihoods and laid off hundreds of thousands of employees. A study by David Neumark at UC-Irvine found that every new Wal-Mart store actually eliminates many more retail jobs than it creates.

The expansion of the chains has triggered a cascade of losses in other economic sectors. Some three million U.S. manufacturing jobs have been eliminated since 1990, in part because the chains have pressured companies, including Black & Decker and Levi’s, to slash costs by moving overseas.

The chains also return very little of what their stores take in back to the communities where they operate. A study in Maine by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance found that only 14 cents of a dollar spent at big-box store remains in the state’s economy.

In contrast, the study found that independent retailers spend more than half their revenue locally. They bank at local banks, hire local accountants, advertise in local media, and require many other local services that chains do not. For mid-sized and smaller cities especially, this is a vital source of economic activity and jobs that pay a middle-class income.

In exchange for all the businesses and jobs they destroy, the chains offer us employment in their stores. Wages for most of these jobs are so low that many big-box employees rely on Medicaid, food stamps, and other taxpayer-funded programs to get by.

None of this looks much like progress. In fact, what the big-box model most closely resembles are the old colonial economies of the European superpowers, which were organized, not to improve the lives of the local inhabitants, but to extract their wealth.

This holiday season, we can declare our independence and begin building a more prosperous economy by forgoing the chains and seeking out locally owned businesses.

Stacy Mitchell is a senior researcher with the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and author of Big-Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers and the Fight for America’s Independent Businesses (reviewed here ). 

This article was first written for the Beacon Broadside.

© 2007 Stacy Mitchell

Filed Under: Independent Business

Homegrown Businesses, Not Global Chains, Build Community Prosperity

July 18, 2012 by staff

I’ll say this for the featured speakers on the opening day of the recent Montana Economic Development Summit: they were consistent. Speaker after speaker noted Montana must “compete in the global economy” to thrive and how the internet was key to doing so. The clichés quickly grew old, but ideas only become clichés if they present some truth.

Technology and international trade undoubtedly serve an important role in Montana’s economy. Yet the cheerleading for corporate globalization only elevated my skepticism of the keynote speakers’ motives (all out-of-state, white, male millionaires or billionaires). After all, if something really improves people’s lives, you don’t need to tell them repeatedly how great it is.

More concerning was the invisibility of community-serving businesses—hardware stores, grocers, farmers and countless other businesses that serve the everyday needs of Montanans. These businesses may lack the sex-appeal of global exporters, but they are the bedrock of local economic vitality. Moreover, their importance only will grow as transportation costs rise and diminish the advantage wielded by global corporations dependent on cheap fuel and weak regulations abroad.

Unfortunately, Target and Wal-Mart—the only two retailers with tables in the Summit’s exhibition hall—represent the opposite of sustainable economic development. Global chains’ displacement of local businesses ensures more dollars will leave the local economy and fosters dependence on corporations with no real commitment to our communities. The history of Butte, MT, where the summit was held, provides a prime example of how such dependence ultimately can ravage a local economy and environment.

But while these mega-corporations and their entourage of think tanks and public relations firms persuade us of their benefits, the benefits of doing business locally often go unappreciated or ignored.

We have much to gain personally from the knowledge, personal service, and quality offered by independent businesses, but the economic benefits are less obvious. Independent local businesses typically hire local designers, sign makers and attorneys to get started. Whether employing people in-house or hiring other local firms, they create opportunities for insurance brokers, computer consultants, advertising agencies and others.

In contrast, global chains typically open a clone of their other units. Locally, they employ many clerks and cashiers, but provide few higher paid jobs and use minimal local goods and services. Meanwhile, profits exit town to corporate headquarters. Thus, local independent merchants recirculate three or more times as much of each dollar in the local economy as chain stores—a multiplier effect that drives economic growth far more than attracting outside entities.

Independent businesses often look for ways to stand out in their communities, embracing unique and memorable tools that reflect their commitment to quality and personal service. One such tool is the use of metal business cards, which offer a level of sophistication and durability that traditional paper cards lack.

Unlike generic cards, Metal Kards add a distinctive touch that resonates with clients and colleagues alike, symbolizing the business’s dedication to excellence and individuality. These cards often become conversation pieces, helping local businesses establish a lasting presence in the minds of potential customers while enhancing their brand’s image.

In today’s digital age, standing out in a crowded market isn’t just about physical presence—online visibility is just as crucial. SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is essential for independent businesses aiming to increase visibility and reach a broader audience. Effective SEO strategies not only help improve a website’s ranking on search engines but also ensure that a business’s online presence reflects its unique qualities and values.

Just like a well-crafted metal card, a strong SEO strategy leaves a lasting impression, helping local businesses build credibility and trust with potential customers who are actively searching for services. One powerful aspect of SEO that can significantly enhance a business’s online presence is link building.

By obtaining quality backlinks from reputable sources, businesses can improve their domain authority and overall search engine ranking. SERPninja is an excellent resource for businesses looking to grow their backlink profile. With its proven strategies for acquiring high-quality, relevant links, this company helps businesses build a strong online foundation.

By focusing on these organic methods of growth, local businesses can create a digital presence that mirrors the trust and connection they foster with their community, establishing themselves as a prominent force in both the local and online markets.

Small manufacturers and service industries also have a stake in the health of these entrepreneurs, who are more willing give their new products and services a chance. Independent businesses, in many realms, are interdependent; their fortunes rise and fall together.

Further, local businesses also return a greater percentage of sales to civic events and community causes, though you don’t often see them photographed with table-sized checks to call attention themselves.

Despite “globalization” hype, understanding the multiplier effect and the benefits of a local ownership is crucial to intelligent, sustainable development in our communities.

Retail chains boast how their stores create hundreds of jobs, but “create” is simply a euphemism for “relocate.” We don’t suddenly need more toasters or toilet paper when a big box store opens. As a result, nearly 85% of sales at new big box discount stores come directly from existing local businesses. Combine this impact with the efficiency of consolidating most well-paying jobs at headquarters, and most chains become net disemployers.

Chain proliferation hasn’t just resulted from market competition; it’s had plenty of help from what Stacy Mitchell, author of the outstanding book Big Box Swindle , calls “the invisible hand of Uncle Sam.” For local officials luring a new national chain is politically seductive and much easier than actual job creation. As a result many chains receive millions of dollars in local and state subsidies—creating a decidedly uneven playing field for independent competitors (whether or not such subsidies are offered locally).

The real giants like Wal-Mart are masters of extracting public subsidies, but they’re not alone. For example, Cabela’s is seeking to move into Montana, starting with Billings, but prefers not to compete in a “free market.” The corporation is seeking municipal subsidies that few (if any) Montana outfitters enjoy.

Tax evasion schemes also unfairly handicap entrepreneurs who pay their fair share of taxes—and raise them for the rest of us. Incredibly, when State Senator Jim Elliot investigated corporate income taxes in Montana, he discovered 40 percent of the largest 500 corporations doing businesses in Montana paid less than $500 in state income taxes in 2002. Such perverse practices must change to create a level (or better) playing field for homegrown businesses; chains already have enough laws rigged in their favor nationally.

For long-term progress, a conceptual change also is necessary. As citizens, we should consciously plan our future with rules that will encourage the values we want reflected in our communities. And as consumers, each time we spend money, we should weigh the full value of our choices, not just for ourselves short-term, but for the future we want in our own hometowns.

By Jeff Milchen, co-founder of the American Independent Business Alliance, which helps communities around the country form coalitions that help independent business compete effectively and prevent chains from displacing local entrepreneurs.

Filed Under: Independent Business

Volunteer

July 17, 2012 by staff

Reclaim Democracy depends on the efforts of volunteers in almost every realm of our work. You can help! Here are a few of the ongoing opportunities. If you are interested in helping, please visit our “contact us” page or email us at info@reclaimdemocracy.org.

Writing & Editing

  • Research – We always need research assistance and most can be done on the web, but access to library research material is sometimes needed.
  • Write Articles – Knowledge or research of current issues related to our goals and strong persuasive writing skills are required. Most articles for our web site or newsletter also appear in major print media. For skilled writers, we will help develop and market your writing. Please send us at least one published clip. 6-50 hours per article.
  • Spanish Translation – For individuals proficient in English to Spanish translation, we aim to translate much more of our material. Translations can be done at the convenience of volunteers via e-mail.

Grassroots Outreach / Fundraising

  • Tabling – Represent us at above-mentioned fairs, festivals, and other venues. Good speaking skills and knowledge of our work is required (a few hours of reading). ~ 3 – 12 hours / event.
  • Host an informational / fundraising party – The best source of new activists and donors is through our existing supporters. Let your friends, neighbors and others know about our work.We’ll provide plenty of support to help.
  • Schedule a Local Presentation – Bring a ReclaimDemocracy.org speaker to your community. This can be a great way to jump-start local organizing. Contact us to learn more.
  • Organize / Participate in a Chapter / Local Working Group – May include some of the following: place posters around towns, write letters to local papers, set up slide shows locally, or work towards city/county resolutions. See our “What You Can Do” primer for more ideas.

Research

  • Varies constantly–please inquire.

In-office Opportunities (for those near Bozeman, MT)

  • General Office Help – Answer calls, help with research,  perform essential administrative tasks. Minimum commitment: 4 hours / week, 3 months. Regularly scheduled weekly.  Opportunities for paid employment after 3-4 months of reliable work.

We also seek help from volunteers with specialized skills, including: accounting, fundraising, web design, graphic design, cartoonists, computer troubleshooters and more. Contact us to learn more.

Filed Under: Activism

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Search our website

Our Mission

Reclaim Democracy! works toward a more democratic republic, where citizens play an active role in shaping our communities, states, and nation. We believe a person’s influence should be based on the quality of their ideas, skills, and energy, and not based on wealth, race, gender, or orientation.

We believe every citizen should enjoy an affirmative right to vote and have their vote count equally.

Learn more about our work.

Donate to Our Work

We rely on individual gifts for more than 95% of our funding. Our hard-working volunteers make your gift go a long way. We're grateful for your help, and your donation is tax-deductible.

Join Us on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • X

Weekly Quote

"The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth."

-- Wendell Berry

Copyright © 2026 · Reclaim Democracy!