The Commission on Presidential Debates' Exclusion of Vital Issues
The Poverty of the Debates
|
|
| Middle Class
|
15 |
| Working Class |
0 |
| Prosperity |
16 |
| Homeless(ness) |
0 |
| Poverty |
1 |
| Wealthiest |
20 |
| Poorest |
1 |
| Crime (street) |
23 |
| Crime (corporate or white collar) |
0 |
| Prison (s) |
0 |
| WTO |
0 |
| NAFTA |
0 |
| Corporation(s) |
0 |
| Labor |
1 |
| "Free Trade" |
0 |
| Immigration | 0 |
| Population Growth | 0 |
| Transportation or Traffic | 0 |
| Slobodan Milosevic |
17 |
| Tax (es) |
144 |
| Social Security |
67 |
| Seniors |
64 |
| Teenagers | 0 |
| Medicare |
58 |
| Drug(s) (prescription)
|
60 |
| Prevention (of illness / disease) |
0 |
| Drug War or War on Drugs |
0 |
The nationally televised presidential debates should address a broad range of national issues that most concern citizens--especially issues that the major party candidates typically ignore when left to their own devices. But under the control of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), many of the greatest concerns of the American public are excluded from discussion entirely.
The exclusion of deserving independent or "third party" candidates has generated the greatest criticism of the CPD, but the narrow range of discussion and lifeless formats also are critical problems.
The inclusion of the two third-party candidates with major national constituencies (Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader) in 2000 likely would have changed the results of this survey dramatically, but we should insist on an entity and structure that ensures broad and substantive debates, regardless of who is participating.
The stiflingly narrow range of discussion is a direct result of the "debates" being controlled by the CPD--a private institution owned and operated exclusively by prominent Democratic and Republican party operatives. The major party candidates are granted near-total control over format, moderators, and who is invited to participate.
This control includes formats devoid of direct dialogue between the candidates themselves or between citizens and candidates. Even the promising "town hall" format has been turned into a spontaneity-free imitation of real discourse by preventing any citizen from actually speaking. The questions are screened and read from a card by moderators like Jim Lehrer, who consistently has declined to confront the candidates with uncomfortable questions.
Even former President George Bush decried the vapidity of the
CPD's events, "It's too much show business and too much prompting,
too much artificiality, and not really debate," said Bush.
"They're rehearsed appearances."
Download a pdf format flier with this information and an overview of the campaign to replace the CPD with the Citizens' Debate Commission.
Read about the Citizens' Debate Commission's debate structure and participation criteria.
See Open Debates for even more detailed background on the CPD.
