Even after the draconian measures of the “Patriot Act,” George W. Bush and company apparently think Americans are too free and that we cannot be trusted to know what further infringements on our freedom are being planned.
The Justice Department’s plans for a “Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003” were revealed only through a Department insider leaking the document to the watchdog group Center for Public Integrity. Dick Cheney and House Speaker Dennis Hastert are the only recognizable elected or quasi-elected officials documented as having obtained the document, which is marked “Confidential: Not for Distribution Draft Jan. 9, 2003.”
Consequences of the proposals in the draft DSEA
If introduced and passed as drafted, the Act would:
Revoke portions of the Freedom of Information Act. (See Section 201, pp. 13-14 of pdf) Your right to obtain information about a friend or family member detained by the government in connection with any activity deemed “terrorist” would be revoked. This is incredible in lieu of the fact that the Freedom of Information Act already allows for the government to withhold such information if its disclosure could hamper investigation of other suspects or events (exemptions 7a, 7c, 7f, in 5 U.S.C. 552b7).
The Act also would prevent you from having reasonable access to information about threats to your health and community, such as levels of toxic emissions (Section 202). The Act refers to such information as “a roadmap for terrorists.” The result: you’ll have to trust the Bush Environmental Protection Agency to disclose any corporate activities that pose a threat to you and your family.
Allow the Bush Administration to revoke your residency or U.S. citizenship. Perhaps the most alarming proposal (Section 501) would give the Justice Dept. power to revoke a person’s permanent resident alien status or even U.S. citizenship for participating in, or “providing material support to … a terrorist organization.”
Since the 2001 “Patriot Act” redefined terrorist activity so broadly that minor vandalism could qualify, donating to a nonprofit organization that, unknown to you, is on Ashcroft’s disfavored list could end your life as an American citizen and resident. Alarmist? Consider that members of the Bush Administration have publicly accused journalists who criticize them of being “terrorists” (e.g. Defense Policy Board Chairman Richard Perle on CNN, March 9, 2003).
Invalidate state legal consent decrees (Section 312) that seek to curb police spying on U.S. citizens, regardless of any tangible evidence of criminal activity. This effectively re-authorizes the CIA and FBI to engage in domestic terrorism against activist groups ( a la COINTELPRO); practices that were made illegal after the well-documented abuses of the 1960s.
If you think we overstate by using the term domestic terrorism to describe the FBI and CIA activities, please inform yourself about this critical history. The Church Committee report (officially the Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States Senate, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, 1976) is a good starting point.
Allow the government to force U.S. citizens to allow invasive collection of DNA samples (Sections 301-306) if the Administration consider someone a “suspected terrorist.”
The Act also would authorize the Justice Department to conduct secret searches of the home of any suspected terrorist for 15 days after any “national emergency,” rather than after a formal declaration of war, as in current law. Wiretaps of U.S. citizens for longer periods and with less court oversight are another proposal. There are many more serious concerns than we cite here. The most thorough analysis of the proposal we’ve seen thus far are available from the ACLU.
We urge you to at least scan the “Security Enhancement Act,” especially if you think we exaggerate the threats to our freedom. Even a casual read should quickly dispel that idea. Then please join us in working to preserve our Constitutional rights.
“A time comes when silence is betrayal. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy, especially in time of war…
We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for the victims of our nation, for those it calls “enemy,” for no document from human hands can make these humans any less our brother.”
— excerpted from A Time to Break the Silence, Martin Luther King’s speech in New York City, April 4, 1967
Join at least 51 communities that have passed resolutions supporting due process and civil liberties to make statement against government repression. Dozens more communities have initiated related efforts. See BORDC.org for a guide to organizing such campaigns.
You can call, fax, or write or visit your U.S. Representative and Senators to voice your opinion on the measures noted in the draft “Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003,” but be aware that no member of Congress except House Speaker Dennis Hastert had been sent this draft as of February 7. You can reach any congressional representatives toll-free at 1-800-839-5276 or (202) 224-3121 (Capital Switchboard), or look up their other contact information.
Only through raising public dialogue can we hope to thwart this massive expansion of government and corporate power at the expense of civil liberties. Your letters to the editor, calls to talk radio (especially conservative shows), and discussion with family and friends all are meaningful and necessary actions. We are happy to offer help with any letter-writing, and our summary provides excellent material to excerpt for adapting to your own voice (but please don’t use it verbatim–editors are wary of form letters).
You also can work to pass a local resolution in support of civil liberties and opposing the “Security Act” or other attacks on freedom, as 32 U.S. towns and cities have already done.