<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Timeline of No-Call Registry Events - Reclaim Democracy.org</title>
<link media="screen" title="default" href="/styles2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link media="screen" title="print" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="alternate stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link media="print" title="print" href="/stylesprint2.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body>
<!--#include virtual="/inserts/header.htm" -->  
<div id="container">
  <div id="maincontent">      
	<div id="text" style="font-size:16px"> 
        <div id="header"><h1>Timeline of Do-Not-Call Registry </h1>
                <h2 class="red">&nbsp;</h2>   
        </div>  
            <table width="100%" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#999999">
              <tbody>
                <tr> 
                  <td width="28%"><div align="center">January 22, 
                      2002 </div></td>
                  <td width="72%" ><p>FTC 
                      issues a <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2002/01/16cfr310.pdf">notice 
                      of proposed rule making to create the Do Not Call Registry.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">April 10, 2002</div></td>
                  <td > <p>14 consumer organizations file 
                      comments in support of the Do Not Call Registry.<a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/tsrcomments.html">View 
                      those comments.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">May 24, 2002</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FTC issues a <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2002/05/16cfrpart310.htm">notice 
                      of proposed rule making to impose fees on telemarketers 
                      to access the Do Not Call Registry.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">June 5-7, 2002</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FTC holds a workshop on changes 
                      to the Telemarketing Sales Rule. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/tsr/agenda.htm">View 
                      the agenda.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 18, 2002</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FCC issues a <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-250A1.pdf">notice 
                      of proposed rulemaking on the Telephone Consumer Protection 
                      Act (TCPA).</a> This is a federal law that regulates telemarketing 
                      and fax advertising and requests comments on creating a 
                      national Do Not Call registry. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">December 8, 2002</div></td>
                  <td > <p>11 leading consumer groups file 
                      comments with the FCC which advocate the Do Not Call Registry.<a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/tcpacomments.html"> 
                      View their comments.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">January 29, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Mainstream Marketing Services, 
                      Inc., TMG Marketing Inc., and American Teleservices Association 
                      file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District 
                      of Colorado seeking to invalidate the Do-Not-Call Registry. 
                      <a href="http://www.ataconnect.org/ataconnect.org-asp//newsrelease.asp?ID=2">View 
                      this complaint. </a></p>
                    <p>U.S. Security files a complaint 
                      in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma 
                      seeking to invalidate the FTC's Do-Not-Call Registry. 
                    </p>
                    <p>The FTC issues <a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/dnc/ftcrules.pdf">new 
                      rules establishing a nationwide Do-Not-Call Registry.</a><br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">March 11, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Congress passes <a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_public_laws&amp;docid=f:publ010.108">The 
                      Do-Not-Call Implementation Act</a> to allow the FTC to collect 
                      fees in order to operate the Do Not Call Registry. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">March 21, 2003</div></td>
                  <td height="132" > <p>Stonebridge Life 
                      Insurance Company files suit seeking declaratory and injunctive 
                      relief against the FTC's Do-Not-Call rules for insurance 
                      companies. Stonebridge argues that the FTC lacks jurisdiction 
                      to regulate the activities of insurance companies. <br />
                      <a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/dnc/03_0739complaint.pdf">View 
                      the complaint.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">June 26, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      Federal Communications Commission announces support for 
                      the creation of a Do Not Call Registry.<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235841A1.pdf">View 
                      the announcement.</a><br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">June 27, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Over 10 million phone numbers 
                      are registered as the National Do Not Call Registry begins 
                      enrollment. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">July 3, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The Federal Communications Commission 
                      issues <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.pdf">new 
                      rules mirroring the FTC's Do-Not-Call rules</a> and adding 
                      entities subject to the Do-Not-Call restrictions beyond 
                      the reach of the FTC's reach, including banks, insurance 
                      companies, and common carriers. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">July 25, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Mainstream Marketing Services, 
                      Inc., TMG Marketing, Inc., and American Teleservices Association 
                      file a petition requesting a stay of the FCC's Do-Not-Call 
                      rules in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. 
                      <a href="http://www.ataconnect.org/ataconnect.org-asp//documents/ATAreq-exp-stay.pdf">View 
                      petition.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">July 29, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FTC issues its final rule concerning 
                      Do-Not-Call registry access fees. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/07/tsrfeesfrnotice.pdf">View 
                      final rule.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 17, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Do Not Call Registry exceeds 50 
                      million registrants. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/09/030917dncstates.pdf">View 
                      FTC chart showing enrollment statistics categorized by state 
                      until September 16, 2003.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 23, 2003 </div></td>
                  <td ><p class="timelineinfo">Judge Lee 
                      R. West of the U.S. District Court of Oklahoma issues an 
                      order <a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/dnc/03_cv_122order.pdf">(view 
                      order)</a> and judgment <a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/telemarketing/dnc/03_cv_122judgement.pdf">(view 
                      judgment)</a> that the FTC does not have the authority to 
                      implement a National Do Not Call Registry. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 24, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FTC files an emergency motion 
                      for stay pending appeal in the U.S. District Court of Oklahoma 
                      in response to its earlier decision invalidating the Do 
                      Not Call registry.<br />
                      FCC Chairman Powell issues a statement supporting the Do 
                      Not Call Registry. <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239153A1.pdf">View 
                      Powell's statement.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 25, 2003</div></td>
                  <td ><p>The 
                      U.S. District Court of Oklahoma denies the FTC's motion 
                      for a stay of its earlier decision invalidating the Do Not 
                      Call registry. Congress passes legislation to ratify the 
                      FTC's authority to implement a Do-Not-Call registry. Judge 
                      Edward W. Nottingham of the U.S. District Court of Colorado 
                      rules that the Do-Not-Call registry is a violation of the 
                      First Amendment. FCC Chairman Powell issues a statement 
                      that joint FCC-FTC enforcement will ensure implementation 
                      of the list on October 1, 2003. <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239215A1.pdf">View 
                      Powell's statement.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 26, 2003</div></td>
                  <td ><p>The 
                      10th Circuit Court of Appeals denies Mainstream Marketing 
                      Services, Inc., TMG Marketing, Inc., and American Teleservices 
                      Association's request for a stay of the FCC Do Not Call 
                      rules pending review of merits. The FTC files an emergency 
                      motion to stay the U.S. District Court of Colorado's opinion 
                      while an appeal can be heard. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/09/mmsiftcstay.pdf">View 
                      emergency motion.</a> FCC Chairman Powell issues a statement 
                      that the agency will vigorously defend the Do-Not-Call list 
                      with the FTC. </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 26, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      FTC files an appeal with the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. 
                      <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/09/mmsiftcnoa.pdf">View 
                      the appeal.</a> President Bush signs legislation that ratifies 
                      the FTC's authority to implement a Do Not Call registry. 
                      The U.S. District Court Colorado denies the FTC's motion 
                      for a stay of its decision invalidating the Do Not Call 
                      registry and further decrees that the rules cannot be implemented 
                      &quot;indirectly&quot; through the FCC. The Direct Marketing Association 
                      urges its members to abide by the Do-Not-Call rules, despite 
                      the court rulings.<br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">September 30, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation 
                      holds a hearing on the Do-Not-Call Registry. The FCC issues 
                      a <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239392A2.pdf">consumer 
                      guide on telemarketing</a>. The FTC files a motion with 
                      the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/09/dncstay.pdf">View 
                      the motion.</a> </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 1, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      FCC, FTC temporarily suspends new registrations to its Do 
                      Not Call registry. <br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 2, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      FCC announces the formation of a &quot;Do-Not-Call Enforcement 
                      Team&quot; and issues statement on telemarketing complaints. 
                      The DMA issues statement that compliance is at 90 percent. 
                      <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A36814-2003Oct2&amp;notFound=true">Read 
                      the DMA's statement.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 3, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>FCC issues statement on telemarketing 
                      complaints. <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239586A1.doc">View 
                      the statement.</a></p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 7, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      10th Circuit Court of Appeals issues a stay of the U.S. 
                      District Court of Colorado's decision, allowing FTC to proceed 
                      with registry while the appeal is pending. The 10th Circuit 
                      consolidates the three cases before the court regarding 
                      the Do Not Call registry and set an advanced hearing date 
                      of November 10, 2003 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. <a href="http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/index.cfm">View 
                      the stay.</a><br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 9, 2003 </div></td>
                  <td  height="21"> <p>The temporary suspension 
                      of enrollment to the Do Not Call List is lifted. Consumers 
                      who had not previously done so can register for inclusion 
                      in the FTC's Do-Not-Call registry.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 11, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>Consumers can begin filing Do 
                      Not Call complaints.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 17, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 
                      FTC and FCC file a consolidated opening brief with the 10th 
                      Circuit Court of Appeals in their appeals case. <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/briefs/03-1429.pdf">View 
                      the brief.</a><br />
                    </p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">October 24, 2003 </div></td>
                  <td > <p>The FTC reports that consumers 
                      registered with the National Do Not Call Registry have filed 
                      more than 37,000 complaints against telemarketers who continue 
                      to call them. 53.7 million numbers are now registered on 
                      the Do Not Call list.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">November 3, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The FCC proposes to fine AT&amp;T 
                      $780,000 for apparent violations of the company-specific 
                      Do Not Call list.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">November 10, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p>The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals 
                      hears oral arguments in FTC v. Mainstream Marketing Service, 
                      the case in which the FTC is appealing a district court 
                      ruling that found the Do-Not-Call list unconstitutional.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">December 10, 2003</div></td>
                  <td > <p >Current 
                      Status: FTC may operate the Do Not Call registry and accept 
                      complaints from consumers.</p></td>
                </tr>
                <tr> 
                  <td><div align="center">December 19, 2003</div></td>
                  <td >The FCC issues the first Do-Not-Call 
                    citation to California Pacific Mortgage of Irvine, CA.</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td><div align="center">January 7, 2004</div></td>
                  <td >The Federal Communications Commission 
                    fines Fax.com $5.4 million for 489 violations of do-not-fax 
                    rules established in 1992, the largest such fine ever.</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
        </table>           
      <br />
      <strong>Update; </strong> On October 4, 2004, without comment, the U.S.
      Supreme Court rejected an appeal by commercial telemarketers, which upheld
       the no-call list as constitutional.       
      <h4>&nbsp;</h4>
            <p>Thanks to <a href="http://bgsu.edu/" target="_blank">Bowling 
      Green University</a> for compiling much of this information.</p>
            <p>&nbsp;            </p>
            <!--#include virtual="/inserts/sendthispage.html" -->
              <!--#include virtual="/inserts/footer.htm" -->
    </div>
  </div>
  <!--#include virtual="/inserts/leftnavn.html" -->    
</div>
</body>
</html>