Support Micro-broadcasting
Upcoming Senate vote to permit low-power FM pits public interest against media giants
By the L.A. Times editorial board
Published July 21, 2004
Editors' Note:
Senators John McCain and Patrick Leahy introduced Bill
S.2505 [pdf] on June 4, 2004. MediaAccess.org is
one good source for more information and updates on this topic. As of today,
you can call your Senators toll-free at 1-800-839-5276 (U.S. Capitol switchboard).
Bored listeners are begging for alternatives to the sameness and repetitiveness
of commercial radio today. The big chains like Clear Channel Communications,
recognizing the disaffection, have responded with a few faux-independent stations
that play quirky or political music that other chain stations won't touch. More
Polyphonic Spree, less Limp Bizkit. They're trying to duplicate the intimacy
and individuality of the old local stations. So why not allow the real thing,
embodied in low-power FM broadcasts?
The big broadcasters, even the big public broadcasting networks, hate the idea
and have repeatedly killed proposals in Congress to encourage hyperlocal stations
that might be run by churches, schools or fan clubs. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.),
chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, is giving it one more try with a vote
Thursday on S.
2505, by himself and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). Just last week,
McCain thought he had enough support to pass the modest measure, authorizing
the Federal Communications Commission to approve as many as 1,000 low-power FM
stations. That was before the National Assn. of Broadcasters stepped up its lobbying
against low-power FM, which it fears could pressure the Power 107s, Lite FMs
and other broadcasters to produce more local content.
Radio is what it is today is largely because of the Telecommunications Act of
1996, which removed caps on the number of local stations that broadcasters could
own in a single market. Clear Channel now owns 1,165 stations in 45 of the top
50 U.S. markets. Infinity Broadcasting is its closest competitor, with 186 stations
in mostly major markets.
In the late 1990s, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard proposed permitting mini-stations
with transmitters under 100 watts and ranges under 3.5 miles. Big broadcasters
cried foul and pressed the FCC to hire the Mitre Corp.- an established technology
consultant - to determine whether low-power stations would interfere with their
signals. When the report concluded this year there would be no interference problems
and there was no reason to delay the smaller stations, the National Assn. of
Broadcasters called the study "deeply flawed" - even though the broadcasters
helped design it.
Low-power FM could please almost endless little audiences, with no damage to
Big Radio except for a smidgen of competition. The groups that support it include
the United Church of Christ and the Future of Music Coalition, which seeks outlets
for musicians who can't get record contracts.
If S 2505 can make it out of committee, it stands a decent chance of becoming
law. With the Mitre report's well-documented conclusion that there's room for
both commercial and community voices, there's no justification for holding up
McCain's bill.


