Telemarketing Group to Appeal "No Call" Ruling to Supreme Court
By Ira Teinowitz
Published by Advertising
Age, March 3,
2004
The American Teleservices Association today said it would fight an appellate court's ruling that found the federal do-not-call registry constitutional.
The ATA and the Direct Marketing Association had sued the government, looking to dismantle a national registry of phone numbers that telemarketers cannot call. The ATA represents telemarketers and some marketers while the DMA is a trade group made up only marketers.
58 million numbers registered
A three-judge appellate court in Denver on Feb. 17 dismissed constitutional
objections to the do-not-call registry, which is managed by the Federal Trade
Commission and Federal Communications Commission. Nearly 58 million phone
numbers are registered on the list.
The DMA is bowing out of the appeal. "We have considered our options with legal counsel and teleservices users and suppliers in our broad membership, and have decided not to pursue further litigation," said DMA President H. Robert Wientzen.
The trade groups argued that while the registry was portrayed as a tool to help consumers wanting to stop direct-marketing phone calls, it amounts to a ban on First Amendment-protected speech that creates an unequal playing field for marketing competitors. They said better enforcement of existing laws and other steps could have eliminated unwanted sales calls without limits to free speech.
Protection
The ATA today said it would "continue its fight for the protection of
commercial free speech."
"We believe that the rights to free speech are being unduly trampled under the guise of consumer protection, and now we'll take our appeal" to the Supreme Court, said Tim Searcy, an ATA executive director.
Work with FTC
Mr. Wientzen said his group had decided to instead work with the FTC to correct
problems in the list.
"The telephone-marketing industry remains committed to respecting the wishes of those who have placed their household telephone numbers on the do-not-call list," Mr. Wientzen said. "Consumers must come first. We will listen to consumers."
© 2004 Advertising Age
Overview of the Do-Not-Call Registry Dispute
The 10th Circuit Appeals Court Decision
Go to Home Page
Each week we review dozens of articles and essays from both corporate and independent media sources and choose one that we believe brings you unique or important information or perspectives on issues of democracy and corporate power. Opinions presented do not necessarily reflect those of ReclaimDemocracy.org.] Index of past features
We review dozens of articles and essays from both corporate and independent media sources each weeek and occassionally post those we believe offers unique or important information or perspectives relating to democracy and corporate power. Opinions presented do not necessarily reflect those of ReclaimDemocracy.org. Index of past features
Fair Use Notice
This site occasionally reprints copyrighted material, the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We make such material available free of charge in our efforts to advance understanding
of issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107.. For more information go to: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes
of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner. Article titles here are not always those used by the originating publication.
